Using The Hooboy Name??

[SmallTownJohn]

Howdy,

 

I received an "update" this morning touting this site:

 

http://hooboysm4mescortreviews.com/

 

What do we know about it? The site is tied to Guys4Rent.

 

The email was signed Scott Aarons

 

 

John

http://www.stj1.com

[Guest RandyRon]

Did you read any of these? I looked at about half a dozen and the reviews were pure drivel; more like copy prepared by a cheap ad agency. Don't think it will be any competition for Daddy. :+ :+

[+ deej]

People have been trying to masquerade as Hooboy since the beginning and it continues today. Try a Google search for Hooboy. The very first sponsored (that means purchased) link doesn't have anything to do with Hooboy.

 

It says a lot about the popularity of the site/brand that Hooboy built that people are still trying to impersonate him nearly 2 years after his death instead of building a brand of their own.

 

It's the price of success. :-(

[badassbadboy]

These jerks need to go, non one has the juice but this site period.

[badassbadboy]

Did some research and yes that site is connected with that God awful site guys4rent formerly own by Dave Barton under a different name.

 

The guy that now owns it is not very smart when it come to the back end.

 

http://www.m4mescortreview.com/reviews.asp?M4M=x=x

 

creates this error

 

Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e10'

[Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Too few parameters. Expected 1.

 

/reviews.asp, line 22

 

I am glad to see this guy is not very smart on the backend, besides that db can only hold up to 250 concurrent users and after put a LCK file on the db and lock out all other users sending back and bad error: server too busy or asp error that no one will ever get.

 

This will make some one fustrated and go else where.

 

Hmmm guess they will have to go to the real review site huh??

 

He uses the same DB for all of his sites, and glad to see he does.

 

}(

[+ deej]

Tony,

 

I took the formatting off your post so the main part of what you intended to show wasn't hidden by the board's HTML interpreter.

 

But leave the potshots from remote sites to the gossip sites, OK?

 

We appreciate the entusiasm, but they actually do have a professional-looking site up and running. It looks good. Give them the props they deserve.

[badassbadboy]

no problem.

 

:-)