rebirh of the hooboy site??!!

[Rick Munroe]

>The working guys earned those reviews. The hard way, on their

>knees, their backs, and goodness knows how many other

>positions. }(

 

And loving it! }(

 

http://www.jrn.columbia.edu/studentwork/cns/2002-05-08/images/shoephone.jpg

[Mouth]

Well, there's the rub...we're not customers. This site has always been free. You could contribute and they had advertisers, but it's a free site. Therefore, none of us has much say into how the new site is going to operate. I'm sure Daddy's looking at these's e-mails and probably has through the years accumulated enough input from everyone to get a consensus on what people want from this site. I rather doubt the site needs PR. I'm sure they get thousands of hits every day.

 

So why don't we let Daddy get the new site up and running. There will be plenty of time to bitch then. And betting on the bitching that will ensue is the easiest sucker money I can think of.

 

 

 

<<Great sites use their customers for input on design, content, etc. He's evidently building a brand-new site right now. Right now is the time to get ideas that might easily be implemented at this stage but be quite difficult later on.>>

[SAdler]

::naked cartwheels::

 

pictures on the eleven o' clock news to follow.

[SAdler]

see post below about naked cartwheels ... encore presentation on 6 am news tomorrow.

[jackhammer91406]

A MID WIFE'S SUMMER NIGHTS DREAM

 

The baby isn't even born yet. And with all this drama, were I the birth mother, I would have an abortion. Sure many people have an interest in what is to come and some even feel they should get a say so in what is to come. BUT, it isn't here yet. There will I am sure be plenty of things to piss people off when the baby finally is born ( I wanted a boy...I wanted a girl....I wanted a cat...)

 

The folks who are all upset should just chill already.

Observers will start to think the place is only inhabited by drama queens.

 

NOW, can we talk about the Dodgers?

[Guest zipperzone]

I have to side with those who think that because it is a free site, we should be grateful for what we get and shut up.

 

Or...... perhaps you would prefer to pay $29.95 per month to belong (that seems about the going rate for most sites these days) and have the right to have some imput???

 

My experience with pay sites is that even then you still have no say in the operation and the web master is king.

 

Looks like we have it pretty good here so why don't we all stop our bitchin'?

[stripfan]

>

>Hey, I also loved Belle and Jolene! Maybe I was just really

>young and liked almost everyone. Then again, I haven't really

>changed much.

>

>Here's one...Sandy Duncan replacing Valerie Harper on her own

>show, Valerie. Now, that was just wrong. :o

 

Jan Hooks will always be my favorite Sweeney Sister. As a youngster I was devastated to see Flo leave Mel's Diner. Yes, I said devastated. Agreed on Sandy Duncan.

 

LOVE BERNICE and her affection for black man, alcohol and cruising. I often have one of her arterial flow problems.

 

Chrissie leaving Three's Company was also a let down. However, Mr. Furley replacing the Ropers was OK by me. Don't get me started on TV Show Themes.

 

I loved the recent Pop Culture Quiz Show on VH1!!

 

LOL

 

stripfan

[Rick Munroe]

>As a

>youngster I was devastated to see Flo leave Mel's Diner. Yes,

>I said devastated.

 

I was even more devastated when Derek and I saw Polly Holliday shlepping into a 99¢ Store in the East Village in the mid 90's, looking a bit disheveled and unfriendly. Speaking of which, check out this similar but far worse encounter: http://www.hellfire.com/celebs/flo2.html

 

>Chrissie leaving Three's Company was also a let down.

>However, Mr. Furley replacing the Ropers was OK by me.

 

I agree. And Kirstie Alley replacing Shelley Long on Cheers was a good thing. A funny show got even funnier and more insane.

[seaboy4hire]

RE: A MID WIFE'S SUMMER NIGHTS DREAM

 

>NOW, can we talk about the Dodgers?

>

>

Only if they are practicing in thier jocks and wife beaters :9 }(

 

Hugs,

Greg

 

[email protected] http://seaboy4hire.tripod.com New page for reveiws http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:8UdCLNz6augJ:www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/greg_seattle.html+greg+male4malescorts.com&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=129

http://i22.photobucket.com/albu

[Guest alanm]

>And finally ……

>

>>Daddy rarely posts in the message center and never mentions

>his

>>personal life. Daddy also gets the reviews up on time every

>week

>>day morning with a minimum of commentary. If Daddy plays

>favorites

>>with escorts, it's not as obvious. Benji, Rick and soon Scott

>will

>>have links to their respective blog below the Coverboy of the

>Day.

 

 

Scott left out the first line of my comment:

 

"Daddy's style is different from HooBoy's."

 

HooBoy did play favorites and often turned the daily posting of reviews into a Eugene O'Neill play. By contrast Daddy is quieter but gets the job done. I was praising Daddy for giving each escort with a blog his own link. On a personal note, I really enjoy Rick's and Scott's blogs. I do not agree with Benjamin's use of blind items about other escorts, but otherwise his blog is also enjoyable.

[jackhammer91406]

RE: A MID WIFE'S SUMMER NIGHTS DREAM

 

For me, Andre Either can wear whatever he wants.

That kid is hot. :9

[SAdler]

>Scott left out the first line of my comment:

 

>"Daddy's style is different from HooBoy's."

 

Hmm .... I guess I didn't feel it added anything to the context. OBVIOUSLY my mistake in reading as it made me jump to apparently incorrect conculsions noted below...

 

>HooBoy did play favorites and often turned the daily posting

>of reviews into a Eugene O'Neill play. By contrast Daddy is

>quieter but gets the job done. I was praising Daddy for giving

>each escort with a blog his own link. On a personal note, I

>really enjoy Rick's and Scott's blogs. I do not agree with

>Benjamin's use of blind items about other escorts, but

>otherwise his blog is also enjoyable.

 

Thank GOD you do still like me. I dunno, I was kinda confused at what you meant when you posted that. I guess I just read that as a dig on everyone mentioned and myself that we get undue special treatment or something. That is one of the main problems of ANYTHING internet related, tone and intent don't truly come across in the written word.

 

Eh Rick? You hot hot sexy man with a studly husband. Mmmm I'm all we.... I think I'll stop before I cum on my keyboard :*

[Guest alanm]

Scott, I went back and read ArlingtonVaGuy's direct response to my original comments. He thought I was bashing Daddy too. It was not an Internet problem. I did not express my thoughts clearly.

 

To be totally upfront, if I ever have a major problem with anything Rick or you say I would use private e-mail rather than a public message center.

 

Alan

[+ ArVaGuy]

>

>Scott, I went back and read ArlingtonVaGuy's direct response

>to my original comments. He thought I was bashing Daddy too.

>It was not an Internet problem. I did not express my thoughts

>clearly.

>

>To be totally upfront, if I ever have a major problem with

>anything Rick or you say I would use private e-mail rather

>than a public message center.

>

>Alan

 

Hey, wait a minute. I did not take your post as a bashing on Daddy. I felt you were making a very valid point that people need to understand that things are different with Hooboy gone. It was my intent for my post to be read as a concurring opinion.

 

The trouble with threads like these is that they can get a bit confusing as they grow longer and more complex.

[Guest alanm]

Thanks for the post, ArlingtonVaGuy.

 

I am glad you understood.

 

I still believe that I could have done a better job (and already thought that when I read my own comments shortly after posting).

 

You are correct about things getting more confusing the longer the thread and the more angry participants get as the arguments progress.

 

Have a great weekend!

[Rick Munroe]

>Eh Rick? You hot hot sexy man with a studly husband. Mmmm I'm

>all we....

 

Hmmm...what were you going to say?

"I'm all weatherproof"? (that could come in handy for water sports)

"I'm all weekend on my back with my legs in the air"? (that could get exhausting)

"I'm all western attired"? (I bet you'd look hot in nothing but some cowboy boots and a smile)

 

Btw, I liked this much better than the "inside" joke. ;-)

[Rick Munroe]

>The trouble with threads like these is that they can get a

>bit confusing as they grow longer

 

I never get confused when things grow longer...I just open up and say "Ahhhhh." :9

[+ Axiom2001]

The point about piling up innumerable emails is quite, quite infantile, do you not think? What real purpose would this serve.

 

My suggestions is that all of us SHOULD PATIENTLY AWAIT the arrival of the new website. I like the current look, and it is so easy to navigate, thus far!!

[+ Axiom2001]

>No, I'm not saying anything should be taken down.

>

>But there's a world of difference between:

>

>1. Posting a quick note here that says "By the way, we have a

>new URL and we're putting up a template so can get registered,

>etc., etc. Let us know any quick thoughts about what we're

>doing by posting them here."

>

>and

>

>2. Doing it anonymously and having it discovered on another

>site and then posted here by someone else.

>

>It just leaves a bad taste in the mouth.

>

>And, for the record, I think that asking people to send

>thoughts about the new site via email is a terrible idea,

>given the existence of this Message Center. It's not like

>there's no easy way to communicate here. Asking for email and

>not responding to things posted here (which has historically

>been Daddy's modus operandi) is asking for every dialog to be

>private. Perhaps that's what he wants. But it completely

>eliminates all possibility of getting a PR buzz going or

>having people toss ideas out that others could refine.

>

>Great sites use their customers for input on design, content,

>etc. He's evidently building a brand-new site right now.

>Right now is the time to get ideas that might easily be

>implemented at this stage but be quite difficult later on.

>

>Basically, it feels like the difference between treating the

>people who come here as allies or adversaries. There are many

>of us who could easily offer suggestions and perhaps one or

>two of those would be worthwhile. But do you see that dialog

>happening? I don't. And the reason it isn't happening is

>because it hasn't been asked for and -- candidly-- telling

>people to sit down and write a note to Daddy via email feels

>like being told to just shut up.

>

>We're talking about emotions here, not facts. PR. Building a

>buzz. Building a community.

>

>It feels to me like he assumes that everyone who went to M4M

>will just automatically become a loyal participant in DRc.

>I'm not sure that's a certain thing. He's creating a new

>enterprise, or trying to. Why not at least appear to be

>welcoming to the very people you hope will support you? It's

>a truism in politics that if you want someone to vote for you,

>you have to ask them to. Nicely. Persuasively. Much the

>same is true with many ventures.

>

>I wish Daddy and anyone else associated with the new site all

>the luck in the world. But, boy, it just feels like it's

>starting off on the wrong foot.

>

>BG

 

 

MANY of you guys are too much to fathom! BITCH! BITCH! BIRTH! is your first, middle, and last names!!!! Damnit, if the webmaster removed the site all together, what would you say then??

 

Why not sit on it and PATTTTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIEEEEEEEENNNNNNNTTTTTTTLY

PATIENTLY PATIENTLY PATIENTLY wait. That's the trouble with far too damn many Americans as it is!

:( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :(

[SAdler]

>"I'm all western attired"? (I bet you'd look hot in nothing

>but some cowboy boots and a smile)

 

WHO TOLD YOU ABOUT MY NEXT PHOTOSHOOT! DAMNIT ... now you've ruined it and I can't take the picture. Oh well

 

>Btw, I liked this much better than the "inside" joke. ;-)

 

I thought you might