ENVIRONMENT Vegan Group Says "Chemical Pollutants" Make People Gay and Trans

[+ Avalon]

https://www.advocate.com/environment/2018/7/19/vegan-group-says-chemical-pollutants-make-people-gay-and-trans

 

These people need to eat meat!

[Chad Constantine]

https://www.advocate.com/environment/2018/7/19/vegan-group-says-chemical-pollutants-make-people-gay-and-trans

 

These people need to eat meat!

 

It may very well be the truth. It was years ago that the Huffpost came out with an article discussing how birth control for women led to them being attracted to less masculine looking males.

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/2981391

[+ Avalon]

It may very well be the truth. It was years ago that the Huffpost came out with an article discussing how birth control for women led to them being attracted to less masculine looking males.

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/2981391

 

Interesting! Thanks! Comes down to hormones.

[maninsoma]

It may very well be the truth. It was years ago that the Huffpost came out with an article discussing how birth control for women led to them being attracted to less masculine looking males.

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/2981391

 

Then why were there gay people before the modern era of "chemical pollutants?"

[Chad Constantine]

Then why were there gay people before the modern era of "chemical pollutants?"

 

It could be from that fact that besides man made toxins that pollution has been around since before the industrial era and that the Earth naturally creates toxins. Humans have not always had and some still do not have clean water, proper nutrition, waste disposal, sunscreen, medicine, great doctors, etc. Is what they are saying highly offensive yes it is but just because it is offensive does not mean that it is correct or incorrect. In my eyes it is just an hypothesis and in the pursuit of knowledge and science people need to learn and prove or disprove even the things they find offensive.

 

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/air-pollution-has-been-a-problem-since-the-days-of-ancient-rome-3950678/

https://www.freedrinkingwater.com/resource-history-of-clean-drinking-water.htm

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/02/when-did-humans-start-polluting-the-earth/

https://interestingengineering.com/11-developments-and-discoveries-in-human-biology-and-medicine-over-the-past-ten-years

Edited July 21, 2018 by Chad Constantine

[maninsoma]

It could be from that fact that besides man made toxins that pollution has been around since before the industrial era and that the Earth naturally creates toxins. Humans have not always had and some still do not have clean water, proper nutrition, waste disposal, sunscreen, medicine, great doctors, etc. Is what they are saying highly offensive yes it is but just because it is offensive does not mean that it is correct or incorrect. In my eyes it is just an hypothesis and in the pursuit of knowledge and science people need to learn and prove or disprove even the things they find offensive.

 

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/air-pollution-has-been-a-problem-since-the-days-of-ancient-rome-3950678/

https://www.freedrinkingwater.com/resource-history-of-clean-drinking-water.htm

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/02/when-did-humans-start-polluting-the-earth/

https://interestingengineering.com/11-developments-and-discoveries-in-human-biology-and-medicine-over-the-past-ten-years

 

Don't get me wrong. I think the study of sexuality is important. But bringing forth a hypothesis that's biased without any evidence to support it and then to suggest that it's appropriate science just doesn't make sense. It's about as logical as suggesting that scientists should research the environmental factors that make Mexicans lazy, Blacks stupid, and women less capable than men. Starting from a place of suggesting that there's something wrong with being gay (i.e., it's unnatural and caused by something bad) versus having an open ended inquiry (what can we learn about why some people prefer to have sex with members of the same gender) isn't science in my book, particularly when there is no evidence to support the bigoted claims. If being gay was caused by "chemicals" and "toxins" then why don't we see homosexuality centered in areas that have higher amount of these environmental issues, and little or no gay behavior in more environmentally clean areas?

Edited July 22, 2018 by maninsoma