IntuitiveTactile

Descriptions have now been removed. They have actually removed them but given a different option and guidelines to summarize. They are making changes so fast they have not given any heads up to masseurs to change their previous verbiage

Only seen his Scruff profile, on there I noted he did massage Never seen an ad so I'm assuming he's otherwise gainfully employed

Beats me but they look like a hot duo Would be great to see them do 4 handed

If I'm not mistaken the BF does massage but not while he's visiting Dave Then I've seen them both on the apps looking for other wild and fun partners for late-night extra curricular activities

He's still got a bf , they don't live together, both wild Open relationship

Looks like he's traveling by car, and stopping there to camp, visit friends, photograph, whatever . Massage may not the primary purpose for his passing through the area. If there happens to be clients in the nearby military bases, or High Desert Communities I'm sure he will consider it, if it works with his schedule Also a way to show he's not in his home city.

If he doesn't choose to publicly list his address, Masseurfinder defaults to downtown LA

Encore

Imagine if you will... A client lays down on the table, after being offered use of the shower. Anal touch doesn't necessarily have to be involved. A smelly Butt crack is a smelly butt crack

THIS! Amazing to me how many guys arrive for a session without consideration to this

You are seeing pics of massage tables, because Masseurfinder is requesting that they be posted in order to increase your visibility in whatever logarithm they employ to circulate ads

You'll now find that Massagem4m has joined the anti shirtless photo brigade <a href="https://ibb.co/dBb9pn"><img src="https://preview.ibb.co/frvfvS/Screenshot_20180326_062204_Chrome.jpg" alt="Screenshot_20180326_062204_Chrome" border="0"></a>

Including Seth Meyers and Amy Schumer

Where there's a Ho, there's a John... Where there's a will there's a way

I If that was the case then why was it broadly supported by the Democrats ? Or were they just lazy and decide not to read the fine print?

BINGO

THANK YOU NVR2THICK for your leveled astute and pragmatic response

https://reason.com/blog/2018/03/21/senate-passes-fosta-sex-trafficking-bill "The bright side is that there's a strong chance this bill will run into trouble in the courts. "Unlike the SAVE Act, which prohibits the knowing advertisement of trafficked sexual services, this statute implicates constitutionally protected speech," points out Notre Dame law instructor Alex F. Levy. (Read Levy's guest post at Eric Goldman's blog for all the legal nitty gritty on why.)"

""The bright side is that there's a strong chance this bill will run into trouble in the courts. "Unlike the SAVE Act, which prohibits the knowing advertisement of trafficked sexual services, this statute implicates constitutionally protected speech," points out Notre Dame law instructor Alex F. Levy. (Read Levy's guest post at Eric Goldman's blog for all the legal nitty gritty on why.)" https://reason.com/blog/2018/03/21/senate-passes-fosta-sex-trafficking-bill

Makes my tongue wag

Hike your ass up in the air. That's a signal you can give

Last sentence on the ad. 4 handed massage available I'm assuming these guys know each other and work in tandem with each other occasionally

He got me with that "upper class part'of Vegas. Do I bring my own sheets for the table?

https://giphy.com/gifs/90s-retro-commercials-26tPo9rksWnfPo4HS

https://giphy.com/gifs/reaction-cartoon-old-mkiWxPS0VznG0