bostonman

Thanks! Odd that it seems normal on rent.men but still expired on rentmen.eu. In any case, hoping he'll respond back. 😉

I had been interested in him for some time, but hadn't had the time to arrange a meeting. Last week I finally "bit the bullet" so to speak and went to contact him - but his RM ad was gone. I did have his number and I texted him to see if he was still taking clients, but I got no response. Now his ad is back on RM, but it's "expired." I wonder what's going on. I would really like to meet him.

He's in Boston now. (Yes, Boston, not some obscure suburb lol). I like the name Kevin lol, so I gave him a look. Aside from the big arms he sure doesn't advertise well. Anyone know if he's better than his ad is?

I assume they're phony. I just block them. Or sometimes, if I'm in a more playful mood, I'll be over-the-top effusive about their interest, and often they just don't know what to do with that.

Hey guys - so I have a rather odd spit-related question. I've been into having guys spit at me for a while now - so amazingly erotic and also so goofy/kinky/rebellious lol. I've never really given much of a thought to health concerns with it - with guys that have I've always said that we swap enough saliva when we make out that I can't imagine direct spitting is any riskier than that. And I do still believe that. Well, I spent some time this past fall with a case of walking pneumonia - no, this was NOT a result of spit play, etc - but it happened. I'm fine now. But as I watch these amazing pics and clips in this thread, I also now have a sort of caveat in my head - should I be doing stuff like that when airborn infections seem particularly rampant? (I did avoid spit play during covid of course). I don't want to lose my passion for the kink, and I still believe that it's probably not any more contagious than anything else, but I've also been a little less willing to seek out any spit play. What do you all think? Is this just an irrational (if understandable) fear after actually getting an awful respiratory illness, or do we think spitting can be riskier than I've always thought?

I'm not so sure. For a while, Friendboy annoyingly sent you to a pay-to-play porn site when you logged in - clearly they needed the help - and then all of a sudden that was gone, thankfully. But then the whole site went down. I tend to think this was more a financial bust than a "moral" one. Also, the one guy I hired off of Friendboy had told me things that led me to believe the site was not managed well...so that could have been part of this too.

I've only hired once off of Friendboy.pro a long time ago - I check the site often just for fun but rarely see many good prospects. But it's been offline for a few days now - does anyone know anything? It could just be some server issue or the owner isn't maintaining the site, etc, but it's always in the back of my mind that sites like this could be forced down, which we know has happened before. One of the few advantages to Friendboy, perhaps, is that providers are allowed to advertise their rates. Rentmen hasn't allowed that for a long time now. But I also tend to trust Friendboy a lot less as a source. Still, not happy that it's offline.

I had a very short text session with him to let him know what I wanted, asking for his rates, etc. He essentially gave one word answers aside from "when we gonna meet?" - I passed. I understand that this is a business, but if I can't get some kind of read on a guy's personality and enthusiasm (and I've had some great pre-meeting talks with escorts that do want to be personable, so I know it's possible to do), it's not worth it to me. I hope he's better in person, but I can't commit to the $ and take the risk that he's not.

Thanks, but ugh - 500 is really out of my reach. I'll have to think carefully with my upper head before my lower head makes me spend that...we'll see...

Thanks! I hope he's not out of my budget range. Can I ask what he charged? (Though I wouldn't be doing an overnight - probably just an hour.)

https://rentmen.eu/ZakZimmer Currently in Seattle, then CA, NY, Bos. Fairly new profile, but wondering if anyone's seen him yet.

I met him once a few years back. Nice guy, fun in bed. I wanted to consider a 2nd time recently, but his RM account is "frozen."

Any experience with this guy? I just sent him an IM, haven't heard back yet, but in the meantime, would love any thoughts. Love the body and his mention of being a former baseball player. I could spend a lot of time on those pecs, guns, and armpits lol. Assuming English may not be his first language (from a look at his interview etc) and I usually prefer guys that I can also converse with, but maybe that doesn't matter too much here lol?

You are absolutely right - I'm sorry. So yes, maybe they should have rerecorded. Perhaps they thought the main draw would be Patti, and for that reason alone felt they didn't really need two recordings. (Whereas, for instance, Spider Woman got rerecorded when the cast changed over, but all 3 leads were different, and I suppose they felt differently then. It was also a different time then, and cast recordings are more of an expense than they used to be.) And yes, much as I adored Lenk in The Band's Visit, from all I've heard her Bobbie wasn't nearly as good. I wonder if they felt the stiff upper lip Brits just wouldn't appreciate "Jesus Christ" used in that context. ;-) BTW - it's also interesting that Larry Kert had to wait for London to get recorded in the original production, even though he took over for Dean Jones on Broadway a month after the show opened. And for that recording, they just replaced Jones' tracks with dubs by Kert.

The Broadway cast was the same, wasn't it? There wouldn't have been enough reason to re-record the show with the same cast and merely a different orchestra. (Much as, yes, speaking as a professional musician, it still would have been nice to have a recording with the Broadway pit.)

I should clarify that they didn't actually tap in this production - but they did in the original (and in most productions I've seen over the years.) The moment as originally choreographed is that three of the couples share tap breaks late in the song (if you listen to the original cast recording you can hear in stereo effect that first one person taps, then their spouse), then Bobby gets a turn - but where his partner (if he had one) would have tapped, there's just silence. Usually in the moments after that, we see Bobby react to the realization that he wasn't "completed" and also most often the couples (who of course realize) scramble to finish the song and in essence pretend that moment didn't happen. It can be a very emotional moment - one of my favorites in the show, actually. But in this production, the business they did in place of the tap breaks just didn't register in the same way, and I really didn't see any acknowledgement of the silence and how that affects the number. I think it's fine not to do literal tap, but what I didn't see in this version is how Bobby and the couples reacted to the moment where Bobby has no one to share with.

I'm really not good at catching photoshop work, but the head does seem too small for the body in some of the pics. And one pic does have a very odd shadow effect that just can't be real. Too bad - I was hoping I'd log in here to find some encouraging comments about him, but thank you all for the warnings. This is why this site is so crucial.

Maybe it's lots of precum? :-)

I really prefer something that could really be a first name. Most probably it's not their REAL first name and that's fine - they're going with a name they think has some sort of sexual appeal or perhaps a name that they just like, or even the name they wish they had been given perhaps. But I'd much rather contact a guy by a first name of some sort as opposed to "Hey SexGod4U6969, how's it going?" What does baffle me, though, are the guys that use one first name as their screenname but then introduce themselves in the body of their ad by a different first name altogether. Most likely they're changing escort names and not keeping track, but I find it annoying.

I'd be curious to get your take on the end of Act I. Originally, Bobby steps in to try to save a precarious moment and proposes to Amy after Paul has walked out. But in this version, it's a gay man named Jamie, and the proposal makes no sense whatsoever. But why do you think this is "maybe even better" than the original? There are other moments I felt that the gender switch didn't work ("Poor Baby" could have remained being sung the women, not the men, and the rewritten "Bobbie ought to have a fella" just sounds wrong - I'm not sure why Sondheim or whoever made the change simply didn't go for the word "husband."), but that end of Act I was one of the big glaring moments for me. Another bungle - having less to do with the gender switching, was how the "couples tap" sequence was handled in "Side By Side." This was one of the few times in my experience with the show, if perhaps the only time, that the Bobby/Bobbie solo moment (i.e. the character has no partner to dance with) wasn't absolutely devastating. The moment barely registered in this production IMO. And yes, the moment in this production where Joanne tries to set female Bobbie up with her husband (instead of originally Joanne making a play for male Bobby herself) really missed the mark entirely. This is what happens when you try to rewrite a show's concept - you wind up with moments that just can't fit the new concept at all, and the new version tries to bend over backwards to no avail.

I saw the tour in Boston in April. On the plus side, it's a very strong cast. The design and staging are clever. But the reimagining largely had me scratching my head. Some of it works by default, but mostly it doesn't make a lot of sense.

And...he's gone, already. Too bad, he was definitely cute. Maybe he wasn't ready for the demands of the profession? Maybe too much partying?

Does anyone happen to know if there's a Boston-based escort around who makes spitting a part of his regular kinks? I'd love to indulge in an intense session but I don't know of anyone outright who's into it, and I don't tend to see it mentioned on RM etc.

I'd call that a form of drooling. And yeah, it's way hot. :-)

He wouldn't quote me a rate, even after I was very specific about what I was looking for. He also "suggested" I make a deposit. No thanks.