freecahill1965

Sent via venmo that was easy.

Yes, bitcoin would be easy. I think you can do with cash app.

H He mentioned to me he was only going to be in New York for a week or so than he is traveling for a few weeks then off to London/Brazil. New Yorkers better get him while they can.

I hope that you will be told the truth. I am confident that his communication with you should prove that the client did not meet WB on 8/26 and the following words you posted from the client is NOT TRUE. 1) the meeting did take place, 2) WB simply was exhausted and actually did perform at a two-star level.

New York, I was Wickedboys last appoitment before he left Boston. Boston is returning him to you for safe keeping. Please enjoy! https://rentmen.eu/wickedboy

I text with the client in question today. He is a 76 year old retired doctor. He recanted. He told me the truth via text. It was pretty much what I said. He made a false post on 8/26. He did not met Wickedboy that day. He made a false post because WB did not make the appointment. WB gave him a free hour of service for his error. He regretted lying and submitting a false review in heinsight. He was apologetic and even asked if there was anything else he could to make up for his lapse in judgement. He gave me permission to share his text. @Golem if you need absolute proof you can PM and I will send it. No sense adding to this post. This now can be put to rest. Truth be told!

Yes, I was aware. I had an appointment with WB today. The clients fraud was reported to RM. RM removed the review this morning. I am not sure if there is a connection.

Awesome response, thank you.

Yes, the truth.

You obviously like to create drama. I wish I realized that sooner. What you believe is irrelevant to the conversation. The guy never met WB on August 26th. The client is dishonorable and dishonest. Based on what you posted, he literally has no integrity either. WB has evidense through texts that they did not meet and will proceed to have the review removed if not done by client.

To the facts without assumptions once again, the client lied. He posted a review for a one hour period of time that never happened. The lying and dishonesty of this client was never the best option to resolve his problem, shit happens. In my opinion, your post leans toward encouraging clients to manipulate the RM review system in a negative way as a form of retaliation if a escort misses an appointment. This kind of retaliation wrong is unethical and should not be encouraged. All these pages of posts can be summed up in two sentences. The client's post about Wickedboy on 8/26 is a fake and should be removed. The client is a lier and dishonest.

It is irrelevant. The meeting refers to the hour on 8/26. They did not meet at that time. Thus, making it a lie.

I understand what you are saying now but your encouraging unethical behavior as a means to retaliate against others because that is the easiest option available. I would disagree with your logic. I would encourage clients and providers for that matter to take the high road. Doing the right thing in the event of adversity is always the better path. The lying and dishonesty of this client was never the best option to resolve his problem even though his manipulation of the RM system and retaliation against WB was the easiest way to get satisfaction.

I am sorry you feel that way. I do not feel your point is clear and your statements are unclear and do not clearly address my point. Are you trying to say that the client is justified in lying about the interaction because the escort missed the appointment?

What is your point? My point is the client lied and submitted false information about a hour meeting that did not occur and that the review is false.

No exaggerations and no assumptions: The client lied and submitted false information about a hour meeting that did not occur. The client did not meet the escort. The review is false.

Yes, it is. Drop me a line. I will be happy to at least take you to lunch.

Y Unfortunately, you are incorrect . I am not painting any picture. The Rentmen policy is that you can't post a review unless you have met with the escort. THE REVIEWER NEVER MET WICKEDBOY ON THAT DAY. He did not spend an hour with Wickedboy. The client lied to get the review posted by checking off he met the escort. He did not have the right to post that the pictures did not match or that the time was not relaxing. I would not have posted something I did not know for fact and for which I have seen the evidence. As for the details, I think he is referring to is that WB missed the appointment in error. He offered the guy two hours of time to make up for it. The guy accepted. The guy posted the negative review inretalitation. The finer details for the false review are not relevant to the fact that the review is a lie. Are you saying that a false review posted for the purpose of retaliation is some how legitimate? The review is a lie. They never met. WB as always did the right thing but the client still lied and the review is not legit.

Feel free to turn my table.

You look way hotter than.that guy maybe he should pay you.

Hot and 5'5 is exciting when on his knees.

Agreed, as most on the forum members who have meet WB know he looks exactly like his pictures. The client is just being mean and unethical

But again, he never met WB on the day of the eval. This makes him a liar. Thus, all his credentials are meaningless and he is an unethical client.

I agree!!! But in this case, the guy never met Wickedboy. Which concerns me that someone can get a negative post posted without seeing the escort.

The guy is a liar. He has never met Wickedboy. I spoke with WB myself. He is inprocess of having it removed.