StLouisOct

Update on two Seattle escorts. Spent 2 hours with Lucaparks. Great guy to spend time with. Good bottom, good bod, great lips. Daddy’s Review submitted. Dylan (wrldtraveledforu) is a good communicator and was kind enough to disclose that he doesn’t kiss. He knew it was a deal breaker and I respect him for his honesty.

You might include in your description of what you want something like, “I love to rim and I recently had an experience where an escort wasn’t thoroughly clean down there. I know you’re a pro so it won’t be an issue with you, but I wanted to mention it anyway.”

Easy answer. He was hosting.

Not sure if you think I’m flaky. I don’t think so. We hadn’t met before. We were set to meet from 2-4 in a respected downtown hotel. He was the host. I had an event to attend at 6:00. At 12:30, after hearing nothing from him and in response to my text, he announces that we can meet in a small RV seven miles north or take the time to find a hotel someplace and share the cost. Not the kind of situation a pro would present to a client.

He got a similar complement earlier in this thread and I was really looking forward to a memorable time. I’m bummed.

Well, I now join the ranks of those who've dealt with goofy escorts. His initial correspondence was great. He was hosting. We would meet at a downtown hotel for two hours in the afternoon. Sent him a text in the morning. No response. 90 minutes before the time I texted him to see if he was still available. Yes, he said, but the nice hotel was too expensive so he moved to a small RV next to a house. We can meet at the RV or rent a hotel if I'd prefer. Would that hotel be at his cost? No, he said. You should pay an extra $100. I told him things had gotten too complicated and not what we agreed on so I cancelled. He said I was disrespecting his time! Received this text a short time later: "If you would have been firm on $500 instead of just being reactionary and canceling like a bougie asshole I would have worked with you but honestly I have zero desire to meet with someone who has so little respect and integrity. I can see why you’re single and paying for people’s time. So incredibly gross. Do not ever contact me again unless it is to apologize."

Bumping

How about this guy - https://rentmen.eu/Seattlemuscle ? Anybody had any experience with him? His RM contact page doesn't include a telephone number so in March I sent him an email through the RM system. He just responded and asked if I was still interested! Not great marketing, but he may have potential.

My limited experience with escorts visiting my city has been with guys who are in hotels during their stay. That makes business sense to me. I've had several situations recently where escorts have not been able to host because they're staying with friends. That doesn't sound like a good business model, but to each his own. Curious though, is coming to a city and being available only for outcalls a common situation in the escort world?

I don’t, but I sure hope you review him for us. I hope he’s more animated than he is in his video clip.

Can anyone report anything about Skyler Roberts? https://rentmen.eu/mentravelsex My first impression is that he looks legit, but he's been on RM since 2015 and has only 4 reviews and there's no M4M commentary about him.

Buster is an intriguing possibility. https://rentmen.eu/Buster_Sly He seems to have been around for a long time, but he hasn't been reviewed on Daddy's and I've found nothing in the Forums discussions. Thoughts anyone?

I’m always into a romantic BFE and I’ve found that seeing a guy approaching from across the lobby adds to that experience. Kissing in an empty elevator is good too. All nice introductions to the main event in the room.

Your investigative skills are to be applauded and such findings are helpful to us all and should be shared directly with Daddy. But I think expecting him to provide his existing service plus do what you do, is asking too much.

I’ve read in a couple of descriptions that the top is willing to bottom but only if he concludes that he’s comfortable doing so or “feels a connection.” I’ve always elected not to spend $ to see if that magical connection might be reached.

Met with him a while ago and don’t recommend him. A nice enough guy, but has no skills or aptitude to be an escort, uninspired kisser, hadn’t cleaned his ass effectively, and has difficulty getting and staying hard (even for boyfriends, he explained).

I was sorry to hear that you’ve been inundated with PM requests in the past. Your approach is understandable, but might you be able to add a bit more information in a post? At least a note as to whether he was a nice guy who you’d hire again. That would sure be helpful.

On the other hand, CAPS are a very good way to have the answer stand out from the pre-existing text. Sorry you felt yelled at.

Ah, that explains Dario’s weird schedule on his RM page. The guy is often in many places at the same time.

SOME COMMENTS FOR YOU IN ALL CAPS Statement 1: Having sex with many, many older men is not illegal, as long as I am 18 and regardless of their age. IF THOSE GUYS ARE PAYING YOU FOR SEX IT’S PROSTITUTION SO IT’S ILLEGAL IN MOST STATES. Statement 2: I am protected by the first amendment to talk about each encounter as long as I don't lie. The number of "outings" I am allowed to make is not restricted by law. YES YOU CAN TALK ABOUT IT. YOUR REASONING ISN’T ENTIRELY CORRECT, BUT I’M NOT GOING TO GET INTO WHEN AND WHY THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOES OR DOESN’T APPLY. Statement 3: Each of these men is legally allowed to buy my silence individually, if and only if they want to. No extortion, they don't have to buy my silence. But if they don't buy my silence, I am allowed to speak to anyone who will listen about it. THEY CAN MAKE A CONTRACT WITH YOU AND PAY YOU $130,000 OR WHATEVER. IF YOU WEREN’T PAID FOR SEX (AS IN THE CASE OF TRUMP AND STORMY) THE CONTRACT IS ENFORCEABLE. BUT IF YOU’RE GETTING PAID, IT’S PROSTITUTION AND THE CONTRACT WOULD LIKELY BE UNEFORCEABLE. THE LAW/PUBLIC POLICY DOESN’T ALLOW A PERSON COMMITTING A CRIME TO ENTER INTO SUCH A CONTRACT AND BE ABLE TO ENFORCE IT. NO DIFFERENT THAN IF YOUR CLIENT COMMITTED A MURDER AND WANTED YOU TO KEEP QUIET. HE CAN PAY YOU A MILLION DOLLARS AND THE COURT WOULD STILL SAY IT’S UNENFORECABLE. Now, please assume we are dealing with a rational and logical, highly competent judge that just tries to apply the law to the facts brought to him by the police. All the police brings is that A) I had sex many, many times, and each time I received some money. PRETTY GOOD EVIDENCE OF PROSTITUTION B) All my clients (who are rational beings and not stupid) explain that they paid me to keep quiet, not to have sex. IF YOU’RE GETTING PAID EACH TIME I BET THE JURY WILL AGREE THAT YOU’RE A PROSTITUTE. The prosecutor is accusing me of both extortion and prostitution, in case one fails, then he hope to get me for the other one. THE EXTORTION ISSUE IS BOGUS IF YOU’RE ROUTINELY ACCEPTING MONEY FROM THOSE YOU HAVE SEX WITH. IT’S MONEY FOR SEX. Question 1: What if it is not the older guy that brings up the "buying my silence" part, but it was me instead, after the sex. Is that extortion in any/all US jurisdictions? Question 2: What if I bring up the hush agreement before the sex? Does that change anything? NOT IN YOUR CASE BECAUSE YOU ROUNTIELY CHARGE FOR YOUR SERVICES. ON THE OTHER HAND, MR. TRUMP’S WOMEN (AS FAR AS WE KNOW) WEREN’T CHARGING. THEY WERE HAVING SEX WITH A POWERFUL MAN WHO CAN MAKE THEM SIGN A CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT TO KEEP THEM FROM DAMAGING HIS INTERESTS. NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT – EXCEPT WHERE THERE MAY BE A POTENTIAL VIOLATION OF CAMPAIGN FINANCING LAWS, BUT TIME WILL TELL ON THAT POINT. I feel it shouldn't, because bringing it up afterwards is more dishonest than bringing it up beforehand. Beforehand means at least the older guy can back out. Question 4: Would a rational and logical judge accept the claim from the prosecutor that all these people were "thinking" of doing prostitution, even though we all claim the opposite, we verbally agreed on the payment for the hush agreement only, and there was no witness to prove that we said anything of the contrary? Basically, what is the criteria in criminal court for knowing what someone was thinking when there are 2 possibilities? Do the police need to provide material evidence, or it is ok for the judge to claim to be a mind reader? I am not from the US, and I don't claim to know the law, but I do claim to be able to reason. AGAIN, IMMAGINE YOU’RE ON A JURY AND THE EVIDENCE IS THAT THIS YOUNG GUY FUCKS OLDER MEN AND GETS MONEY AFTERWARD OR BEFOREHAND. THE YOUNG GUY CAN COME UP WITH ALL SORTS OF THEORIES, BUT JURIES OFTEN LOOK AT FACTS AND APPLY LOGIC. MY BET IS THAT THEY’D SAY “NICE TRY WITH TH BOGUS ARGUMENTS, BUT WE KNOW WHAT WAS GOING ON -- GUILTY AS CHARGED.”

I tell the truth, but I’m always pleased when many say that I don’t look that old. Not telling reminds me of a story about of friend of my parents who died at a ripe old age, but no one knew how old she was. She never told. We figured the truth would come out at her funeral when the priest spoke about her, perhaps starting with her year of birth. BUT, he started out saying, “Samantha Brooks was born…at the turn of the century…” A big disappointment.

Not the scenario you started with.

Whew, I’m really tight and I wouldn’t let that one in!

Of course it is if it’s two consenting adults who are exchanging money for sex. That’s prostitution.

Assuming the sex was illegal in your jurisdiction (i.e prostitution) a contract not to tell about that illegal act would probably be unenforceable. In Mr. Trump’s case, I don’t believe it’s ever been alleged that he paid for sex with the lucious Stormy.