josh282282

Sorry for the tardy response. I've been quite busy. QTR: You entirely miss my points. I remind you that I called you out after observing a trend throughout Daddys Reviews where you are the one who posts anti-men comments on how men accused of rape should be considered guilty and prove their innocence after which contradicts everything our judicial system and society believe in. I'm not alone in this observation. Others from this forum have observed this, too. You clearly promote a "guilty till proven innocent" ideology. To put into practice this type of Salem-Witch-Trial/McCarthy-era Communist-witch-trial mentality of "guilty till proven innocent" ideology is, fortunately, against US law. Unlike you, most logical thinking and fair minded people would never agree to such a horrible policy. When I hear that someone is accused of rape I most certainly will not believe he is guilty till he is proven guilty by a court of law. It's the right manner to approach this. It's the American way. I am told you are a lawyer. Unlike the rest of us, you are specialist in law. You should know all this. This makes it even more shocking you would propose such a blatant attack on the rights and dignity of men. I can come to no other conclusion that surely you must hate men for proposing such an misguided man-bashing idea. An idea I thoroughly reject. Note to the forum: as I said before, rape is heinous crime. I am not a rape apologist. Those found guilty should be locked away in prison for a long, long time. I am not unawares that rape continues to be a terrible scourge on our society. And I do not hate woman. Quite the opposite. I'm quite the feminist at times with strong pro-woman beliefs. To name a few: I'm a firm believer in equal pay; a woman's right to control her body (very pro-choice); love Planned Parenthood; believe woman should be allowed in the armed forces infantry; and LOVE Hillary Clinton( Vote HRC 2016!!) !

QTR, thank you SO MUCH for proving my point. How in the world you have come up with such man-hating idea? In our society, people are innocent till proven guilty. But not with you. I shudder to think what the world would be like if you were in charge. This forum was started by a Gay man and it's for Gay/Bisexual men and their escorts. And these men on this forum I have learned are quite intelligent, witty, kind, insightful, and deep. We come here for support, information, humor, and community. I really want you to reconsider your (incessant) need to throw in our faces how men accused of rape are (in your eyes and should be in others eyes) guilty. If we wanted to read such anti-men propaganda, the media is FULL of options. Do you truly think we come to this forum for this? An analogy: there is a breast cancer forum started by a female breast cancer survivor written for breast cancer survivors and those currently battling it's terrible assault. A man starts posting how breast mammograms are being done too frequently and a waste of money and the science doesnt support yearly mammograms. Don't you think the women on the forum would get mad at the guy screaming out that mammograms save lives? Are you even for one second considering what you post and it's location? It is my STRONG opinion that due to the fact that the men on this forum are reluctant to join in (too much) controversy or painful topics. I suspect this reluctance applies to this topic of rape/rape allegations/presumed guilt. Who wants to get involved with this? But two of us on this forum HAVE commented on this (Unicorn: I am not suggesting you agree with everything I write, only that you made the same observation as I did). I think there are others who have made the same observations but just won't join this tempest. And I respect this, cuz I greatly respect my peers on this forum. Amazing men. In regard to assuming men are guilty when they are accused of rape, I ask once again that you stop such assertions on this forum. I am certain there are more receptive forums.

Well, um, yes, Quotetheraven, I DO expect a woman to decline sex if she doesn't want it. There is SIGNIFICANT evidence that the female accuser was a LYING PIECE OF SHIT and eventually the whole rape charge was dropped cuz it was suspected to be bogus accusations from a liar. My opinion is she was offered sex by a (heterosexual) man-whore and saw him as a cash cow. I don't think I'm alone in this opinion. Don't believe me? Read on. From CBS NEWS: "The woman's asylum application described how she and her husband were persecuted and beaten by regime forces in Guinea. She claimed her husband was imprisoned, tortured and subsequently died at the hands of police. The woman later admitted to prosecutors that her account was false and that she had been coached by another man to create the fictional account for the purposes of the application." "The woman twice relayed to investigators emotional accounts of how she was gang-raped in Guinea. She later said those accounts were false and were similarly used for the asylum application process. However, she did still claim that she was a rape victim, though the details did not match her original story." "The woman admitted to using a friend's child to fraudulently claim an additional dependent and increase her tax refund. She also misrepresented her income to maintain her housing." Additionally, the New York Times, citing unnamed law enforcement officials, reported that: - In the day following her accusations against Strauss-Kahn, the woman had a phone conversation with a man imprisoned and charged with possession of 400 pounds of marijuana. In the conversation, which was recorded, she spoke about possible benefits of pursuing the case, two officials told the paper. - Investigators discovered the imprisoned man was one of several people who deposited around $100,000 in cash in the woman's bank account over the last two years. The deposits were made from around the country - in Arizona, Georgia, New York and Pennsylvania. The woman claimed to know nothing about the deposits, saying they were made by her fiancé and his friends. - The woman was also paying phone bills to five different companies, though she told investigators that she owned just one phone. Here's the link to the article. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/da-strauss-kahn-accuser-cleaned-after-encounter/ Quotetheraven: PLEASE leave your man bashing to another site. FYI: MEN come here to support each other, get information, let loose, laugh, share stories, and enjoy each others (online) company. We DO NOT come here to be bashed (by woman) and hear our gender being accused (by you) of being rapists (I've noticed you bring that accusation A LOT to this forum but we are [mostly] G.A.Y. we don't rape woman so it's not quite germane to this forum). Those accusations & dramas are for OTHER websites/forums. Please stop doing the man-bashing here. It's not appreciated. PS I'm fully aware that rape happens and fully support those who are found guilty of such heinous crime be put in prison for a long, long time.

Yes. And his pics are real.

Maybe... But I'm not sure he is all, or even mostly to blame. As a client I bring my own set of issues to a session which can impede attainment of any goals. It's just too easy to blame others and not take responsibility. I'm leery of doing that. But I hear your point. I would love to hear others firsthand account. Durchmuch: I think he said he spoke Czeck.

Yeah, it was his cell phone.

Hi gentleman, I flew into LA to see him and this is my firsthand experience: He was - very easy to catch in a text conversation to set up the session. -always hard and its big, bordering onto huge. -a good conversationalist. -definitely a clock watcher (yes, he set a timer but I honestly have no issues with this), - able to present a freaking amazing body just as advertized in his pics. His stats are totally acurate. -only ok with the bed activities. They were... not... my best experience. But I honestly think that was more my fault than his. I couldn't relax. But I was that way prior to meeting him. Could he have done more to try to relax me? Probably. Would it had worked? I'm not sure. I fear it would not have. So I'm ultimately reluctant to put too much blame on him. - not able to start our session off well. He showed up not ready. He had to shower first. I didnt appreciate that. I would think that an escort should come to the session at least showered, right? I didn't appreciate (at all) that after we had set up our appointment, I asked for a brief 3 min (I assured him it would be brief) phone conversation (everything was set up via text) to see what he sounded like and make sure he didnt sound high or like a serial killer, but he staunchly refused. I almost cancelled cuz of this, but I ultimately kept the appointment. I'm (marginally) glad I did. But I honestly think many guys are better prepared to enjoy their time with him more than I. I hope this helps?

Ok, Truhart, I now understand the whole title progression. Thank you. I've been curious for sometime. But what about the "trophy points"? All it says in the Help section: Somebody Likes You Somebody out there liked one of your messages. Keep posting like that for more! It's under 2 points. Does that mean for every "like" I get, I get 2 points? But that can't be correct as I have 23 likes but only 8 points. Please help me to understand. I'm lost. And afraid....

Oh, I see. Jeez, I missed that salient point.... Thanks Gman.

Hey ArVaGuy, Thanks for the heads up. Anything about Tom F is interesting. But what was your point? We were talking bout Tom escorting, not his porn. Not trying to criticize you, but just want to understand your point.

Did you get a response back? If not, do you promise to tell us when you do?

But if his phone isn't working when one calls the number listed, how would a text get thru? He never got your text, Dorian.

FYI: the phone number on his RB ad doesn't work. ??