Curiously, the OP didn't keep the original text that provoked the response from Reese, because according to him, he was celebrating his birthday. Then, he doesn't publish the apology from Reese(which I'm sure was by text) and gives his own synopsis of what was said. This leads be to believe that the OP provoked this incident, demonstrated by the fact he won't produce his texts of the conversations.
The basic tenets of Due Process require an opportunity to be heard and evidence. Neither of these tenets are met here and the OP hasn't met his burden of proof. Too many false accusations these past couple of years and it has become endemic !! Reese has a history of good reviews and no fair minded person should believe what the OP at this point, particularly because evidence is being withheld.
Let us not be ruled by emotion.