marylander1940

I guess someone here can't ignore this thread and keeps on clicking to see what's going on.

Good answer!

I just posted about it... you read my mind.

Thank you from bringing this up, you're the one who bump this thread from the past not me nor @samhexum At first I thought Grindr for escorts would be a bad thing and that's why I was against it. After much thought, reading posts by other members and talking with a few escorts I think I was wrong and Grindr would be a good thing for escorts. Hiring or not is a big step in life we all have crossed at a different type and for different reasons. Grindr might be a way to make some folks hire someone they can't have for free because he's "out of their league". Later on that client after a few good experiences paying and getting exactly what he wants, when he wants and without drama (and some not to so good times spending hours texting and getting blocked) will move on to hire from RentMen.com. I still think most of the guys offering money on Grindr do it because it might be cheaper and it's almost like hooking up, yet they're hiring... This might get rid of the guys asking for a 30 mins rate and other bottom feeders who after BP was shut down started harassing escorts on Rentmen.com Caveat emptor: some folks start using it to attract men with fake pictures and mugging them if they don't give their wallet. Something like this happen a few blocks from my place at a hotel called Dorchester House to a well-known lawyer. I think it was either Back Page or Craigslist. An escort recently posted that in Europe guys on Grindr are using diamond symbols to announce they are available to anybody who wants to pay. What if Grindr uses the system of Adam4Adam* and makes sure those advertising as escorts and making a profit from their site have one free account to have fun with their neighbors, and a paid one to be hired by other mostly older and out of shape men? *After Sesta and Fosta I'm sure they'll never do it.