I think that for some readers the written content comes across as conventionally or stereotypically “woo-woo”, but that may be a constricted and unfair interpretation. Similarly, the idea that one specific gifted provider person is the optimal match, when actually a set of appropriated and integrative philosophies underpins the approach, comes across as A LOT. The price points and hyperbole combined do little to disabuse folks of the notion that this service is TGTBT, as the kids say, even Yellowjackets-Lottie-grade, catering to the naïve and gullible.
Perhaps a talking-head video, a brief kind of ‘Ted Talk’ rendering, not X-rated, that is custom made for us here, or via a YouTube format, would go some distance in exemplifying the uniqueness and fee justification that is purported here, drawing the cucarachas tentatively from out of the baseboards.
For me, the golden rule doesn’t mean forking over ingots to a self-proclaimed libido and orgasm whisperer miracle worker without some ‘a priori’ evidentiary basis. I’m just off of a month spending in the range of fifty-five a session for what I would deem to be profoundly satisfying sexual self-actualization. The greatness of the Kool-Aid was just fine, thanks. The only experiential deficit being made up, be it interpersonal, meta-physical, spiritual, or what have you, related to the absence of opportunity and availability at home region. That doesn’t mean, of course, that a healthy dose of skepticism shouldn’t accompany the idea of a reader’s perceived prospects for matching the degree of satisfaction I just described.
