DFdub

Actually sad to see his ad gone. Had a few great sessions with him. Definite new agey ness to it, but a great massage and a very sensual/erotic experience - as long as you're not the type that thinks erotic only means deli service during a massage. He has rules, but if you respect them, a great time. Mainly - mutual touch allowed except for his equipment, and his underwear stays on the whole first appt (but only first appt). We clicked really well, and neither of those was a barrier to a great time. Highly recommend if he pops back up though.

MUF - Money Up Front Simple rule - never ever pay MUF when asked to by a new provider who requires it when you walk in the door; experience/service is generally doomed as soon as you agree

Saw him in Vegas. Amazing body; extremely sexy; picks so so accurate. 🤤 Enough to make me break the never MUF rule, but trust me... DAMN! 🥵 Anyway, I seem to've gotten distracted. Nice massage technique; not trained but not amateurish; great body contact; very sensual. 😈 Massage lasted 15 mins, and then fun. Fun was very fun indeed until ... Diego finished 5 mins into what I consider foreplay. Then, he abruptly got up and said his appts end when he finishes because he "doesn't have anymore sexual energy" after that 🙄 "And me, Diego?" Blank stare. Begrudgingly got a bit more time, but still out the door before an hour and ... umm.. unresolved. 😟 So much promise. While it was good, it was so so good until it wasn't at all. Diego has skills, but cannot recommend. YMMV - maybe different experience if hired exclusively for full svc.

Anyone have experience with this new arrival in Dallas? https://rent.men/Jarlenrojo

Funny, I prefer him with the beard and normally I'm the opposite. ☺️ Hard to believe no one has sampled this traveler yet.

Same provider. https://www.masseurfinder.com/massage-therapists/38690/ Saw him before; looking forward to his next trip to Dallas.

Went by RonStoic originally and now going by TonyTheMan

I'm an idiot sometimes. 😊 Tried again on a particularly slim pickings night and met him. Definitely NOT the guy in the pictures. Less muscular though fit Indian-Canadian guy with tattoos in a seedy, smoke-reeking apartment. 😠

More like he wants to be a stevia baby. Not nearly as tasty as real sugar, and leaves you feeling unsatisfied. 😉

I did end up meeting him. He is available for short term appts, but is looking for a long term sugar daddy. He is straight, and does nothing except allow you to service him. He has a straight friend with a sugar daddy who evidently is happy with no kissing, no mutual benefits, etc so he's looking for the same.

Scheduled him recently. Arrived for appt and he wasn't ready. Ended up leaving after waiting 10 mins. He finally reached out 20 mins after appt time. Got a "bro" type vibe from texts, but not a "serious professional" vibe which turned out accurate for me. YMMV

Anyone partaken of this delicious looking newbie yet? https://rent.men/LiamFer

I second Jaime / Cubanbd https://rentmasseur.com/Cubanbd Would also add Mathias https://rent.men/COLOMBIANBOYMDE

I don't disagree. Normally avoid so many tats, but didn't diminish the experience for me. No smell/hint of smoke on him or the place so again wasn't an issue for me even if not ideal. YMMV.

Saw this new provider as he was going through Dallas. https://rent.men/ZAC_GREY Colombian traveling around the US the next few months. Massage was okay, not great. Profile is new, but DAMN are those photos accurate. Hot, sexy, responsive, fantastic time. Adorable accent, fluent English. Please sample his services so he decides it us worth visiting again - especially those in DFW. 😁

Similar experience last fall. Scheduled appt, and he sent me to the wrong hotel. After knocking twice at the room, he realized and said he had changed hotels that day due to bad service and pasted wrong address. Okay; just down the street so benefit of doubt. Massage was okay at best. Strategically avoided meaningful mutual touch. Told me how much he likes black women and large breasts. Complemented his own body a lot. Insisted I was going to think of him next time I had sex. Would not repeat.

Would not recommend. Massage was okay. Applied so much oil and so frequently though that I have a pretty good idea what a basted turkey feels like. I’d put the pics at closer to 15 yrs old than 10. He kept the room as dark as he could and stayed in the darker areas; assume to make that fact less noticeable. Friendly guy but an odd experience overall.

Had a few appts with Gabriel and recommend for anyone not set on deep tIssue. Medium pressure massage on a table. Nice personality, adorable slim twink body just like pics. Enjoyable conversation, enjoyable silence. Sensual/erotic elements throughout, will repeat.

Your own comments seem to betray you to Alex’s truth. 🤷🏻‍♂️ First, you offered Thurs or Fri. He said Thurs then, by your own words, “quickly switched to Friday” - that could be as simple as he looked at his calendar wrong initially and was already booked, or realized it would be too close to another appt, or even saw an earlier text asking for Thurs only and honored the prior ask since it came first and you offered both. Regardless, he adjusted the time quickly per you (and it didn’t seem to bother you either so maybe don’t hit that note so hard and often). After the meet was cancelled, you have now offered speculation about him bumping you for another client or him cumming too much or him having taken on several clients in qhat must have been a very lucrative night or whatever. My point is - you do not actually know why he originally adjusted the time quickly and you’re making it a huge deal because the appt was cancelled. Second, if you mentioned him cumming directly to him in all texts total even half as many times as you alluded to the act or how you or he should feel about it in your last post alone, he was justified. It’s not a convincing look. (Oh, and FYI - for a young hot twink in early 20s midnight to 1p is way more than enough time to reload, period. So, that isn’t plausibly why he cancelled just based on basic biology.) Honestly, your review and fleshing out the details just makes me more inclined to hire him. Too bad I missed him when he was here. Hope you have better luck in the future, @Aedo Good call, @Alex_Twink

These brothers, no? Roman was in Dallas until this summer but not since. Schedule didn’t allow me to try before he left, but see his ad still up showing Dallas based but new “traveling” dates to CA added continuously since July or so. Brother Alex’s link also below. Roman https://www.masseurfinder.com/massage-therapists/43130/ Alex https://www.masseurfinder.com/massage-therapists/43151/ Prior thread on them: https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/149070-411-on-at-home-massage-by-alex-los-angeles/#comment-2245425

Sweet, sexy and playful/witty. Average massage, nice twinkish body. Very responsive to preferences. Would recommend trying at least once. 😉

here… and here.. and no info but here too…

Besides scheduling discussion, has anyone actually seen him?

It would seem awfully elitist / white savior complex of us to assume all day laborers are one paid blowjob away from losing survival and that we must protect their virtue because they can't themselves. Or, that day laborers would not be capable of choice when posed with ... the offer of a choice. My brother-in-law worked as a day laborer occasionally for a couple years back in the housing bust to make ends meet because the contractors for whom he did construction jobs (1099-based) didn't have enough regular work. A coworker's deadbeat ex-husband worked exclusively as a day laborer to avoid wage garnishment for back child support. But they're both white and American so did they still have a choice? 🤔 I'm not sure how that fits into any day laborer stereotype assumptions. Getting back to upsells though - I tend to doubt all clients are self-indulgent hedonists with too much spare cash. I mean, guilty here 🤣 but still. There are lots of clients that are socially awkward or physically unattractive, etc that would be just as unable to decline rationally if encountering a dominant, sexy hot provider aggressively upselling. Imagine someone who saves to hire twice a year desperately seeking physical contact and blinded by passion who forks over his utility money caught in the moment. I'm just saying that we should avoid inserting our biases vs being open to possibilities. Not all clients are privileged. Not all day laborers are victims of society who need saving. Not all providers are desperately forced into this work (which is what that implies). Not all hiring events put the client in the position of power.

I am intrigued by the juxtaposition of members who are both: (a) commenting here that upselling by providers mid-massage is tacky/weird but potentially reasonable or just inconvenient; while also (b) commenting with emotionally charged language in Hiring Day Laborers that even asking day laborers if they are willing to do sex work is inherently exploitative/immoral/despicable. Wondering how the scenarios are materially different from a power imbalance perspective but are not regarded as equal offenses. Provider advertises massage and not additional services. Let's assume Client finds provider sexy (why else hire?) so likely Provider more physically attractive in some way/in desired shape for Client preference - thus creating a power imbalance tilted to the Provider. In the middle of service, Provider offers additional options for an upsell to the Client. Client may now be in a compromised position and Provider likely hopes that Client has diminished decision-making capacity - even more power imbalance for Provider. That's why only offered mid-service, after all. And yet, not considered exploitative or predatory or beyond wrong - just icky or a buzz kill. Provider waiting for Client to be most vulnerable to offer something Client might not normally do by asking him if he wants more at a vulnerable moment. Client sees a day laborer looking for work. Client says, "Hey, you're cute. Want to spend an hour in my hotel for $300?" Day laborer who may be in a compromised financial position chooses to say "yes" or "no" based on his comfort level and situation. That sounds like substantially the same scenario, but is somehow egregiously exploitative (as if hiring young guys with RM ads who does not enjoy it but this ended up the best work he can get, or hiring immigrant providers in same financial situation but an ad is somehow not exploitative using the same scale). Taking advantage of people who are not poor while they are sexually aroused and might not be otherwise comfortable spending as much money is a substantially similar action. What if the Client on the table cannot resist the hot Provider and agrees to give his last $200 for the week? I absolutely agree that propositioning day laborers seems tacky. And so do upsells mid-service. In neither case do I think giving an adult man a choice is inherently exploitative or coercive. But if it is, I struggle with why it is not for both scenarios where a power imbalance of some sort that might lead a person to make a decision they would not otherwise. 🤷🏻‍♂️