That’s correct - that doesn’t describe my typical social calendar 🤣. I guess we know why that is 😉
Are you offering that as justification? Might we thereby conclude that a certain high ranking elected official who creates snarky names in critique is justified? I suspect “no”. That’s rhetorical …please don’t follow that rabbit hole off topic 😅
The point - if a member here asks for feedback on experiences with a guy, they’ve already asserted interest. They don’t need another member critiquing their tastes and preference. The critiques are petty and reflect poorly on the guys making them.
Being gay or a fashionista doesn’t justify rude incivility.
I know you’re not saying bad behavior is ok. 😉. But at some point we have to call BS, right?
I don’t disagree. But I’d prefer to say nothing than to make a post to simply criticize a physical attribute or feature.
Posts asking for experiences with a provider are not invitations for aesthetic critique
