MuscleGent

I’ve met him three times and he is very alluring, easy to communicate with, but vibe with him did feel a little transactional. So depends on what you’re looking for—pics are very accurate, amazing look

Thanks for updating your own post. You certainly didn't need to but it's incredibly helpful for the rest of us.

Well I reached out to the one guy who left a review on RM and he said favorable things, so I decided to contact the provider.  He responded to me right away and came across as a good, kind, and happy person.  So we set up a meeting earlier today.
The man is GORGEOUS.  His physique is incredible.  Huge, muscular, symmetrical, and hard as a rock.  And while he doesn't show his face in his public RM photos, I can assure you he is quite good-looking!
Our time together was physical, passionate, and completely satisfying. 
On top of it all, he really is a great guy - very kind, friendly, smart and fun to be with.  If you're in Dallas and have a chance, I cannot recommend him highly enough!  
If you have specific questions, feel free to PM me.

I was with him in Los Angeles less than two weeks ago.  He is a great guy and GORGEOUS.  Very handsome and muscular (huge arms).  He's very interactive and has a giant member which he loves to share along with the rest of his hot body.   Highly, HIGHLY recommended!

I’ve met him three times and he is very alluring, easy to communicate with, but vibe with him did feel a little transactional. So depends on what you’re looking for—pics are very accurate, amazing look

Daniel Montoya, or Martin Rogers

So a fantastic Thursday to all!    So how many of you are dog lovers and wake up with the love and admiration of your canine comopanion(s)?
A beagle lover here.    "Scout-Scout"  gives good wishes.    It was a late night and he is giving me a little comfort!

One of the biggest challenges that I've observed over the years is the number of "411" threads on a specific person.  There are times we could have anywhere from 3-12 on a single person!  This could happen for different reasons...  such as someone not knowing how to use the search function or the provider had changed their name.  
When we eventually launch the new review site, when a new item is added... a forum topic will automatically be created for that place/person.  It will have a subject of:
[ Category ] Item Name 
So for example, it might look like:
[ Escort ] John Doe
The first post inside of that topic will contain fields from the review (I can pick which fields get brought over so not all may be posted).  The goal will be that the topic will become the master topic about discussion about that item (person/place).  
Over time...  if we see information that changes about the item, people will be able to report it so that it can be updated.  So if an escort changes their name for example, someone would report that record and provide the new name.  A moderator will be able to update the item.  They'll also be able to add the old name to a special field called "Former Names".  This will let us to better track those who change their names from time to time.  
Inside the review record, it might look something like:

If other things change, that can be updated in the record itself.  
All of the detail from that record anytime it is edited would also sync to the master thread and edit the first post in it with the updated info, including the topic title if there was a a name change involved.  
Now... I'm going to put this out there now that moderators may from time to time not publish a name change in the "Former Names" field.  If we have reason to believe there is a risk to the person or there is another legitimate reason, we may update the name field only without adding the old name to the former name field.  
This will hopefully allow the first post to contain all of the latest known info about each item as it gets changed over time without needing to update 500 places.  If it works out the way I'm hoping, this will become the "source of truth" about the item and people can comment over time with their own observations, etc.  The topic itself would not be used for reviews.  (That's what the review system is for.) But general discussion about the person would happen there.
Eventually if someone does post a new thread about someone where a master topic exists, the moderators may end up merging that post into the master.
This is obviously not in place yet.  I'm just tossing the idea out there now so folks have a chance to comment on it and get used to the idea.