The State of REVIEWS

[Guest DallasObserver]

I never suggested that a review should be stroking material. All I have proposed is that a review have sufficient content so the reader can make a proper determination about hiring the escort.

 

It really is a simple suggestion and I've already indicated the solution. However for those who missed it, don't publish empty reviews.

 

-Dallas Observer

[Guest alanm]

Now that HardRock is gone, Dallas Observer shows up with equally strong opinions, minus all the personal information. That's fine. The more the merrier.

 

To me, a good review is one that captures the encounter, including the good and the bad. Years ago I hired an escort before reading all his reviews. I had a great time, but not perfect. I went back and read all his reviews. One his earliest reviews - a good review otherwise - included a line that mentioned that the escort was sexually immature. That was a perfect characterization, which I realized only when reading the review.

 

Few people are that good at writing reviews. Also that comment might

cause problems if the reviewer wanted to hire the escort again. That

last consideration is a big factor in all the rave reviews. I have held information back because I wanted to hire the escort again, putting my own interest above others on this site. Should have come clean, but the sex drive proved stronger.

[Holden]

>I never suggested that a review should be stroking material.

>All I have proposed is that a review have sufficient content

>so the reader can make a proper determination about hiring the

>escort.

>

>It really is a simple suggestion and I've already indicated

>the solution. However for those who missed it, don't publish

>empty reviews.

>

>-Dallas Observer

 

 

Do you mean something like this from today's review???

 

"Experience: I was kind of nervous, but he started with a breake the ice massage. He is more handsome in person, nice, educated, the sorrounding in his apt. was very relaxing. He made me feel good,and I got what I wanted."

 

Could it be that he got what he wanted: A nice, educated escort with a very relaxing apt?

[+ ArVaGuy]

>>To me, a good review is one that captures the encounter,

>including the good and the bad. Years ago I hired an escort

>before reading all his reviews. I had a great time, but not

>perfect. I went back and read all his reviews. One his

>earliest reviews - a good review otherwise - included a line

>that mentioned that the escort was sexually immature. That was

>a perfect characterization, which I realized only when reading

>the review.

 

However, now that older reviews are being archived in a manner that's difficult to access this ability to check past reviews is lost. Would you have been able to glean such from "Positive review by XYZ on ...."? Consequently the site has less value for determining compatibility and making an informed choice.

[jawjateck]

Even more than the content and level of detail, the most important part of a review is its author IMO. I have used this site for five years, and there are several reviewers that are totally credible based on my experience of having met the same escorts. One review by a trusted contributor carries more weight than 10 reviews by those who are just passing through but never hang around after the first review.