No show reviews and discussion

[Nvr2Thick]

I'm going to try to split this discussion off from the "Negative Reviews" thread.

 

I've been searching the forum for examples, and I've found two dominant themes:

 

1) There are plenty of forum posted accounts of no-show escorts, or encounters that didn't work out because of alleged poor communication. Many of these included the escort's name and location.

 

2) There are many posts where a forum members mentions the no-show without mentioning the name. These threads often break down into a protracted discussion of the no-show review policy.

 

I know that when mention of an escort encounter in a forum post has sufficient detail it is called out as a review, then deleted, and the moderators request that a review be submitted. We've established that a no-show is not a review, and we've seen that describing the circumstances of a no-show is often tolerated in the forum. Is there an official policy stating that no-shows cannot be discussed in the Deli?

 

If no-shows can be discussed in the forum, can we get over ourselves and do so? If you've met with an escort and had a positive or negative encounter - submit a review, and provide all the detail one would expect for a formal review. If you've had a missed connection post a summary of the circumstances in the forum and move on. Maybe the perceived value of this information will allow the forum will evolve to include a section to organize it.

 

If no-shows can't be discussed in the forum then that's just one of the guiding principles we'll have to live with.

[Steven_Draker]

In my opinion, allowing no-show reviews would open up a can of worms.

 

One of the reasons Daddy doesn't allow reviews in the Message Forum is that he has to deal with multiple stalkers and vendettas towards escorts.

 

No-show reviews are hard to be verified and vetted. Internet stalkers and trolls would make up any story to hurt intentionally someone's reputation and business.

 

We have a few right here in the Forum.

[jakeleyman]

I am one of the customers who has been no-showed by a prolific poster on this site.

[HoseMaster]

After reading the "Negative Reviews" thread again, I do think that no-shows need to be addressed, whether it's here on the forum, or in a review format. I don't think a first-time reviewer should be able to do it, but someone that had at least, say, 3-5 reviews. Having at least 3-5 reviews develops rapport and trust, as I never trust a first-time reviewer. The escort-in-question would, of course, be able to dispute it as a normal review. After wasting time and money myself on no-shows, and seeing other clients wasting hotel rooms and plane flights, I think it would be a valuable asset to the reviews. Just because something has been in place more than a decade doesn't mean change is due. Change is good sometimes. Although I enjoy reading the reviews that Daddy painstakingly goes through, and sometimes hire based off them, I believe the site can be skewed because some people are scared to write a negative review, a negative review may not be published, or people aren't allowed to post a no-show review.