Hayden Borne as Coverboy?

[humboldt]

I must admit, I was rather surprised by the choice of today’s coverboy – Hayden Borne. I had assumed – wrongly – that the choice in coverboys was meant to signal something a little more than it does. But then I went back and read the FAQ page. This is what it states:

 

“The cover picture is chosen from the day's reviews or new pictures. The only real requirement is that we see his eyes. The Coverboy does not represent this site and being selected does not imply an endorsement from this site. We try to select a variety of looks in coverboys. There is no charge for being the coverboy.”

 

Nevertheless, this particular escort has had some pretty negative reviews written about him very recently. In fact, two of the four reviews are “not recommended.” Three of the four reviews were submitted by first-time reviewers; but one of the negative reviews was submitted by a reviewer who had reviewed multiple escorts. (This reviewer appears to have recommended all of the other escorts whom he has reviewed.)

 

I completely understand Daddy’s policy *not* to have coverboy status be confused with a recommendation or endorsement from the site! But I guess I was just surprised to see today’s choice. Then again, he sure is cute….

[Guest Starbuck]

I only read the young man's four reviews after seeing this post about his coverboy status and, for me, the reviews were more of a surprise than the use of his image as a coverboy.

 

If that latest review is really from a 51-year-old business owner with "good health and financials," I can only say that no 51-year-old entrepreneur has ever come across more like a 20-year-old's idea of what 51 sounds like. Or had judgment more like a 20-year old based on his decision to hire "Hayden" after that blistering (and unrefuted) third review. And how very nice that the bottom line for today's reviewer (who generously schedules overnights with "nothing planned or committed to") is that you ought to give "Hayden" a chance to explain about that third review.

 

Oh ... but wait a minute ... can't we assume that Daddy already offered that chance? ... and that "Hayden" failed to take advantage of it?

[+ Gar1eth]

I must admit, I was rather surprised by the choice of today’s coverboy – Hayden Borne. I had assumed – wrongly – that the choice in coverboys was meant to signal something a little more than it does. But then I went back and read the FAQ page. This is what it states:

 

“The cover picture is chosen from the day's reviews or new pictures. The only real requirement is that we see his eyes. The Coverboy does not represent this site and being selected does not imply an endorsement from this site. We try to select a variety of looks in coverboys. There is no charge for being the coverboy.”

 

Nevertheless, this particular escort has had some pretty negative reviews written about him very recently. In fact, two of the four reviews are “not recommended.” Three of the four reviews were submitted by first-time reviewers; but one of the negative reviews was submitted by a reviewer who had reviewed multiple escorts. (This reviewer appears to have recommended all of the other escorts whom he has reviewed.)

 

I completely understand Daddy’s policy *not* to have coverboy status be confused with a recommendation or endorsement from the site! But I guess I was just surprised to see today’s choice. Then again, he sure is cute….

 

The 1st and fourth reviews sound suspiciously similar. "I am going to pay for this escort- he's going to come over- then 'no big whoop'- I don't care what happens". How many times would you imagine this scenario to occur? And it happened twice for this escort. I wouldn't trust either of those reviews farther than I could throw them. As for him being cute- well he isn't ugly. But he's no one I would spend money on. To paraphrase a song very slightly,

 

"There are lots of good (and handsomer) fish in the sea,

There are lots of good fish in the sea"

 

 

and believe me- I have no idea how or why this lyric just popped into my head- If it hasn't already been proven- this would definitely earn me my gay card

 

Gman

[adriano46]

I only read the young man's four reviews after seeing this post about his coverboy status and, for me, the reviews were more of a surprise than the use of his image as a coverboy.

 

If that latest review is really from a 51-year-old business owner with "good health and financials," I can only say that no 51-year-old entrepreneur has ever come across more like a 20-year-old's idea of what 51 sounds like. Or had judgment more like a 20-year old based on his decision to hire "Hayden" after that blistering (and unrefuted) third review. And how very nice that the bottom line for today's reviewer (who generously schedules overnights with "nothing planned or committed to") is that you ought to give "Hayden" a chance to explain about that third review.

 

Oh ... but wait a minute ... can't we assume that Daddy already offered that chance? ... and that "Hayden" failed to take advantage of it?

 

+1 -- and read the cover boy review and the very first review -- they sound too familiar. Same writer, different name? Oops - sorry G-man you noticed it too. I had not read to the end of the comments I was so disturbed that he was chosen as "Cover Man"!