Jump to content

Can you imagine this happening when you were in high school?


Guest
This topic is 4260 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looks like he was "Noel" in Sean Cody videos. I hope he didn't bareback!!

http://www.inquisitr.com/1103410/florida-student-expelled-after-appearing-in-gay-porn/

 

http://www.manhuntdaily.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/2/files/Noel-bottoms-for-Joshua-in-a-bareback-sex-scene-for-gay-porn-site-Sean-Cody-0-630x315.jpg

 

Nice pole! I wonder if he gets teased about it in the locker room...

http://www.fitdudesnude.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/noel_05.jpg

 

http://www.fitdudesnude.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/noel_08.jpg

 

http://bananaguide.com/gallery_images/12153/galleries/BG/sean-cody-noel-003.jpg

 

http://bananaguide.com/gallery_images/12153/galleries/BG/sean-cody-noel-009.jpg

 

Oops! It looks as though he does bareback. You think his mother would be a bit more concerned!

http://geekpics.net/images/2013/11/28/ZjSh7o2Cr.jpg

 

Think he needs some help with his Calculus homework?

http://jackoffjunkie.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/06.jpg

 

I guess he gets an "F" in Sex Ed--he must have skipped the lesson on playing safely!

http://queermenow.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Joshua-Fucks-Noel-Bareback-Sean-Cody.jpg

 

http://queermenow.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Noel-Sean-Cody-Gay-Porn-Star-Getting-Fucked.jpg

 

http://gaypornarama.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/157-e1381560723514.jpg

 

I bet Sean Cody makes a bundle today! Talk about free advertising!

Posted

I feel very sorry for this young man in that we are all getting a voyeuristic kick out of discussing his being "exposed' in a way I personally doubt 95% of the men here who post or read the postings could ever endure at his age. We have discussed him already on this forum, and just about every gay blog has thrown itself into the maelstrom -- most of us would have shriveled up and crawled away at such exposure to public scrutiny (and I daresay some would have contemplated suicide) at that tender age. Is there a reason to keep rehashing this story? Is there some higher moral ground someone here has? Personally I feel sorry for this young man, and regretting that he has had to be so overexposed at such a young age.

Posted
I feel very sorry for this young man in that we are all getting a voyeuristic kick out of discussing his being "exposed' in a way I personally doubt 95% of the men here who post or read the postings could ever endure at his age. We have discussed him already on this forum, and just about every gay blog has thrown itself into the maelstrom -- most of us would have shriveled up and crawled away at such exposure to public scrutiny (and I daresay some would have contemplated suicide) at that tender age. Is there a reason to keep rehashing this story? Is there some higher moral ground someone here has? Personally I feel sorry for this young man, and regretting that he has had to be so overexposed at such a young age.

 

I'm not really getting any kind of kick voyeuristic or otherwise. He's a nice looking boy. I worry about guys who get into porn this young. It's hard enough for older people to maintain their equilibrium. I also am very worried about his choice to bareback. My main thought is he's just so young. And my feelings are more one of worry and concern vs voyeuristic kick.

 

Gman

Posted
I feel very sorry for this young man in that we are all getting a voyeuristic kick out of discussing his being "exposed' in a way I personally doubt 95% of the men here who post or read the postings could ever endure at his age.

 

??He's the one who exposed himself... We're not the voyeurs, he's the exhibitionist. He provided the show, we're just doing what he wanted us to do--and that is watch. And I certainly hope that he didn't think that using a fake name somehow made himself anonymous.

Posted
??He's the one who exposed himself... We're not the voyeurs, he's the exhibitionist. He provided the show, we're just doing what he wanted us to do--and that is watch. And I certainly hope that he didn't think that using a fake name somehow made himself anonymous.

 

Can we please start checking if there's a previous thread about a subject before opening a new thread about the same issue?

 

http://www.companyofmen.org/showthr...accepted-again

Posted
Can we please start checking if there's a previous thread about a subject before opening a new thread about the same issue?

 

My starting this string when there was a previous one present was obviously unintentional (and completely harmless). Fedssocr pointed out this fact in posting #3, and the point was made. There was little point in your repeating it in posting #4. In repeating this for the 3rd time in posting #8, you're behaving in an obviously obnoxious and intentional manner. If you think I was trying to slight you when I accidentally started a string when you had already started one, you're simply being paranoid. No, I don't read every string before I start one, and I didn't know the guy's name was Noel in SC until after I had already started the string. Yet you certainly were aware that someone had already pointed out the prior string and feel it necessary to point out the same fact again and again.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...