"Satisfactory" vs. "Recommended"

[corndog]

I'm always mystified when I read reviews that rate the escort as "Satisfactory" but then go on to describe the experience in totally glowing terms. To me, a rating of Satisfactory means "just ok," but often the details of the review paint a totally positive experience that would merit a "Recommended" rating.

 

Do y'all have a different interpretation of these ratings?

[seeker630]

I'm always mystified when I read reviews that rate the escort as "Satisfactory" but then go on to describe the experience in totally glowing terms. To me, a rating of Satisfactory means "just ok," but often the details of the review paint a totally positive experience that would merit a "Recommended" rating.

 

Do y'all have a different interpretation of these ratings?

 

Speaking for myself - I use 'satisfactory' when the experience was ok but I'd probably try someone else next time, and 'recommended' when I'd definitely like to repeat! When I read reviews, the narrative is more important than the rating - since tastes and preferences and priorities differ among us, I might find someone else's 'recommended' guy only 'satisfactory' - or vice versa. That's another reason why I think it's critical that reviewers give enough narrative/descriptive detail about the experience as well as about themselves to enable the rest of us to determine how relevant a reviewers opinion/rating is to us. The recommendation of a reviewer who is a muscular bottom who spent the sesson getting pounded & was in heaven doesn't help me.