Jump to content

"Tommy' Maximum's Response.


JT Brooklyn
This topic is 7368 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

IMHO...The "Response to the Review" does explain the "Complications" during the "Working Guys" Time Spent with the Client. BUT it doesn't say the period of "Time between their Experience", and the Time he was going to set up a "Discounted Appointment", with another "Workin Guy", IF the "Alleged Rash" Did exist? Did he question the Rash and it's "Treatment" before the Discounted Appt was Offered? AND was this what made the "Client somewhat Disagreeable?" Just thought I would mention "MY Thoughts" on the Response. :+

Posted

RE: "Tommy' Maximum's Response.

 

>"MY Thoughts" on the Response.

 

The response was done ages ago. I was the reviewer. The agency evidently "verified" the info on Tommy at this point in time but the reponse was posted a long time ago and discussed in the message center.

 

I had a heat rash at the time - I hadn't had air conditioning for over a week during a 100 degree day heat spell and part of the reason I went to New York for the weekend was to escape to air conditioning.

 

The problem with the call was the fact that Tommy didn't want to top or get topped by me or the other escort and the other escort involved in the call was listed on the site as versatile, told me he would not bottom and only bottomed once or twice a year in his private life and never with a client or for another escort on a call. He has since been let go or quit the agency. The biggest thing was the the other escort I saw with Tommy discussed a former escort's drug use. He finally admitted those statements to the agency owner and the agency owner was shocked and pissed off at the escort. In any event, I was not able to use the "discount" that weekend since I was leaving the next afternoon.

 

The next trip to New York they did honor the reduced rate. I was with Brandon and an independent escort and since then I have seen Brandon again and another escort at Maximum (Jordan) twice. Jordan evidently enjoyed his three way with Brandon and me (he topped both of us and bottomed for both us - a rare instance of Brandon on top) and when I returned to New York and wanted to see him with Brian of A-List he immediately agreed. He topped both Brian and me and bottomed greedily for both of us. Jordan is a sweatheart - and is a terrific top and enthusiastic bottom.

 

Let's not get into a rehash of the unpleasant call with Tommy and Vincent. It's ancient history and just an example of getting two lousy escorts in a three way. Since then I've gotten terrific escorts in three ways.

Posted

RE: "Tommy' Maximum's Response.

 

Very Sorry Vab... for the Rehash. I realized after I commented, that the Response being the Last Word on the Subject is best! You are Definitely one of the "Creditable" Guys around here! :+

Posted

RE: wait jest a minute

 

>Excuse MEEEE????

>Buddy, you win that hands down. Don't forget, I have seen you

>in action old friend. Even Tomcal can't keep up with you.

>heheh }(

 

Methinks you must have me confused with someone else -or my evil twin ?. ;)

Posted

RE: wait jest a minute

 

I'm going for the title of sluttiest - when I go to Rio in November. Wait - in Rio Tomcal has that title and I'd probably have to do 10 guys a day to vie for his title.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...