To review or not to Review...?

[Guest ncm2169]

I'm posting this both in the Lounge and Ask the Escorts, cuz I want both Clients' and Escorts' points of view. :-)

 

As I've noted in other posts, I'm a newbie as an escort client. Ignoring a forgettable experience 9 years ago, I've hired 2 escorts since I discovered this site, both on a recent business trip to LA. I've already sent in my review of one who was, umm, worth reading about in my review.

 

The other was a last minute arrangement through a service. The service delivered in a timely fashion but the escort was, IMHO, mediocre, if mediocre = what I'd call "rehearsed." (Sorta like, "Hi. I'm your date for tonight. Now I'm gonna kiss you before we even say, 'hello', because you're a horny businessman from out-of-town, and then I'm gonna let you feel my big cock because you'll really get off on that.") x( . Get the idea?

 

That was probably a cheap shot, because he was a nice guy, but as I say, soooo rehearsed. While he is listed on the service's website, he has not been reviewed here. He is also shown in the service's ad in Frontiers. Both pics are better than he appears in real life (don't we usually hear the opposite?) ;-)

 

There's obviously more, but I'll stop here. Escorts, talk to me. What's fair here? :-)

[Guest Hole_4_Hire]

I see nothing wrong with writing a fair and objective review of a medicore encounter. Most of the reviews here are overly positive or extremely negative.

 

I don't know any escort that always gives a stellar performance. I suspect more honest reviews would result in less unrealistic expectations by clients.

[Guest Chazzz69]

As a client I say post the review. Said escort may learn something and improve, if not then you help others on this site in making a choice about hiring him or not.

 

 

Chazzz69