Jump to content

Bush Hemmorhage Continues. . .


trilingual
This topic is 5663 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Today's SF Chronicle reports latest California poll figures showing Bush's popularity in the state at 28%, just shy of the lowest numbers ever: 24% for Nixon just before he resigned. Congress fares even worse, with only 23% approval, although Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who's up for reelection, is seen much more favorably and is favored to win. There is also a closely-watched Congressional election in North San Diego County (another Republican redoubt) to fill the unexpired term of disgraced Repiglican "Duke" Cunningham. In a reliably GOP district, the race is too close to call (and the Repiglican contenders are busily vilifying each other as not being conservative enough).

 

The same article reports that the Ohio poll by the Univ. of Cincinnati, issued Friday, shows Bush support at 35% in a "must-win" Republican stronghold.

 

According to today's NY Times, he's even bleeding in "Bushlandia," the rock-ribbed Bush bastion of Utah, Wyoming and Idaho: "A poll released in May by SurveyUSA, conducted in Utah for KSL-TV, found that 51 percent of respondents approved of the job Mr. Bush was doing, with 46 percent disapproving. The margin of error was plus or minus four percentage points. The firm, through its other polling, found that the only other state above 50 percent was Idaho, at 52; in Wyoming, it was 50 percent. Mr. Bush's approval rating has dropped as low as 23 percent in Rhode Island and New York.

 

In Utah, Mr. Bush took 72 percent of the presidential vote in 2004. His support has dropped since then, according to polls, because many conservatives are upset over immigration and, to a lesser extent, the expansion of the federal government."

 

The Times also reports that in Arizona the Senate race has become competitive, which could mean the much-to-be-desired departure of Jon KKKyl at the hands of a wealthy Democratic shopping mall developer, and a couple of Congressional districts have become competitive, as well.

 

It looks like there are opportunities in all these places to start turning things around. If you live in any of these areas, and you're sick and tired of the way the U.S. has been going, you can make a difference by contributing to Democratic candidates in competitive races in your state and volunteering for their campaigns. Money is important, but so are volunteers -- well-organized Democrats often manage to prevail over much better funded Republicans if they can reach their supporters and ensure that they vote on Election Day, and that takes volunteers, not just massive TV buys! And as we have learned in the past couple of decades of tightly won elections, every single vote counts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Bush" "Quayle in cowboyboots"

 

Today's rat jumping off the sinking ship is Vic Gold, a personal pal of Lynne Cheney's who spills the beans to the Washington Post. Actually all the beans are coming in his soon-to-be-published (this month) book, Invasion of the Party Snatchers: How the Holy-Rollers and the Neo-Cons Destroyed the GOP.

 

Until then we'll just have to be satisfied with what Gold, a close associate of Bush's father and a true believer from the Barry Goldwater days of conservatism, had to say to the Post:

 

"For all the Rove-built facade of his being a 'strong' chief executive, George W. Bush has been, by comparison to even hapless Jimmy Carter, the weakest, most out of touch president in modern times," Gold writes. "Think Dan Quayle in cowboy boots."

 

h/t Crooks and Liars

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

In order to post in the Political Issues forum, all members are required to acknowledge that their post is in compliance with our Community Guidelines.  In addition, you acknowledge that it meets the following requirements: 

  • No personal attacks: Attack the issue not the person
  • No hijacking: Stay on the subject of the thread 

  • No bullying, hate speech or offensive terms/expressions

In addition, if the moderators feel someone is reporting content simply because if it’s political stance (such as but not limited to reporting it as off topic but not other off topic replies by those that agree with your stance), the reporting person may receive a warning as well.

Content that does not comply with the above requirements will be removed.  Multiple violations may result in a loss of access to this forum.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...