Jump to content

RUMSFELD'S BALD-FACED LIES EXPOSED


Tom Isern
This topic is 6055 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

May 4, 2006

Rumsfeld on Defensive Over Iraq

By REUTERS

 

Filed at 6:46 p.m. ET

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld faced tough questions and hecklers during a stormy speech in Atlanta on Thursday, with a former CIA analyst accusing him of lying his way into the Iraq war.

 

Rumsfeld, an unyielding defender of the war, denied lying. He told an audience at the Southern Center for International Studies that the Bush administration gave an ``honest opinion'' that prewar Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

 

``I would like to ask you to be upfront with the American people. Why did you lie to get us into a war that was not necessary, that has caused these kinds of casualties? Why?'' asked audience member Ray McGovern, who had a 27-year career as a CIA analyst.

 

``Well, first of all, I haven't lied,'' Rumsfeld said.

 

One woman whose son was a U.S. soldier killed in the war asked if the Pentagon was making sure American troops were better equipped for combat. ``You bet,'' Rumsfeld said. ``And I'm so sorry about your son.''

 

There have been 2,411 U.S. military deaths in the war, with 17,874 troops wounded in combat, the Pentagon said on Thursday. Opinion polls show U.S. public support for the war declining. President George W. Bush recently voiced strong support for Rumsfeld after a handful of retired generals demanded his ouster, accusing him of strategic blunders in Iraq and ignoring military advice.

 

Rumsfeld, whose speech focused on U.S. military alliances worldwide, was interrupted briefly by hecklers, including one clutching a sign that read: ``Guilty! of war crimes.''

 

McGovern pressed Rumsfeld about the case for war made by the administration before the March 2003 invasion.

 

``I'm not in the intelligence business,'' Rumsfeld said about U.S. assertions that now-deposed President Saddam Hussein possessed chemical and biological weapons and was seeking nuclear arms.

 

Rumsfeld said then-Secretary of State Colin Powell, in his February 2003 speech before the United Nations detailing U.S. beliefs about Iraqi arms, had ``spent weeks and weeks with the Central Intelligence Agency people and prepared a presentation that I know he believed was accurate.''

 

Rumsfeld said Bush, who made the threat posed by Iraq's weapons his main justification for war, also ``spent weeks and weeks with the Central Intelligence people'' before making his case to the American people.

 

``They gave the world their honest opinion,'' Rumsfeld added. ''It appears that there were no weapons of mass destruction.''

 

'I DID NOT'

 

McGovern shot back, ``You said you knew where they were,'' referring to the Iraqi weapons.

 

``I did not,'' Rumsfeld retorted. ``I said I knew where suspect sites were.''

 

``You said you know where they were, near Tikrit, near Baghdad, and north, east, south and west of there. Those are your words,'' McGovern shot back.

 

``I'd just like an honest answer,'' McGovern added. ``We're talking about lies,'' also mentioning the administration's assertions of prewar ties between Iraq and al Qaeda.

 

A week and a half into the war, Rumsfeld was asked on March 30, 2003, on ABC's ``This Week with George Stephanopoulos,'' whether he found it curious that U.S. forces had not yet found weapons of mass destruction.

 

``Not at all,'' Rumsfeld responded, according to a Pentagon transcript of the interview.

 

``We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat,'' Rumsfeld stated.

 

Rumsfeld on January 20, 2003, said Saddam's government had ''large, unaccounted for stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, including VX, sarin, mustard gas, anthrax, botulism, and possibly smallpox,'' as well as ``an active program to acquire and develop nuclear weapons.''

 

Other audience members in Atlanta were gentler. One asked about ``what happened in your childhood to make you the man you are today? This might help some parents, because you're a great man.'' Rumsfeld noted that ``my mom was a school teacher and my dad read history voraciously.''

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pants on fire!

 

Of course, Rumsfeld did say he knew where the WMD were. From ABC’s This Week, 5/4/03:

 

STEPHANOPOULOS: And is it curious to you that given how much control U.S. and coalition forces now have in the country, they haven’t found any weapons of mass destruction?

 

SEC. RUMSFELD: …We know where they are. They’re in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>McGovern shot back, ``You said you knew where they were,''

>referring to the Iraqi weapons.

>

>``I did not,'' Rumsfeld retorted. ``I said I knew where

>suspect sites were.''

>

>``You said you know where they were, near Tikrit, near

>Baghdad, and north, east, south and west of there. Those are

>your words,'' McGovern shot back.

 

>A week and a half into the war, Rumsfeld was asked on March

>30, 2003, on ABC's ``This Week with George Stephanopoulos,''

>whether he found it curious that U.S. forces had not yet found

>weapons of mass destruction.

>

>``Not at all,'' Rumsfeld responded, according to a Pentagon

>transcript of the interview.

 

>``We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit

>and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat,''

>Rumsfeld stated.

 

This is typical of Rumsfeld and the rest of the Bush administration when it comes to defending the war. When they are challenged on what they said earlier, they hotly deny it. Then when tapes are brought forward that show they are lying, they have already moved on. But their credibility is being shredded in the process and it is showing in the polls. Most Americans no longer trust what W and his henchmen are saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

In order to post in the Political Issues forum, all members are required to acknowledge that their post is in compliance with our Community Guidelines.  In addition, you acknowledge that it meets the following requirements: 

  • No personal attacks: Attack the issue not the person
  • No hijacking: Stay on the subject of the thread 

  • No bullying, hate speech or offensive terms/expressions

In addition, if the moderators feel someone is reporting content simply because if it’s political stance (such as but not limited to reporting it as off topic but not other off topic replies by those that agree with your stance), the reporting person may receive a warning as well.

Content that does not comply with the above requirements will be removed.  Multiple violations may result in a loss of access to this forum.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...